Block
Wooster Home Page
Wooster Home Page
Home | Search | Site Index | Site Map | Directories Block
Q & A
Wooster Menu Bar
Future Students Alumni & Friends Faculty & Staff Families & Visitors Wooster Students
Pamela Pierce

Pamela B. Pierce
Associate Professor of Mathematical Sciences

Pamela B. Pierce is an associate professor of mathematical sciences at The College of Wooster where she joined the faculty in 1994. She specializes in the field of real analysis, and also has an interest in math education, specifically preparing elementary and secondary education students to teach mathematics.

Pierce received her M.S. (1988), M.Phil. (1992), and Ph.D. (1994) from Syracuse University. Prior to that she earned her M.Ed. (1986) at the University of Massachusetts and B.A. (1985) in mathematics at Amherst College.

She is a member of the Mathematical Association of America, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, and the Ohio Council of Teachers of Mathematics. In addition, she is a Fellow in Project NExT, a nationwide program for junior faculty in mathematics, and a member of Project Kaleidoscope's Faculty for the 21st Century, a group of faculty leaders in mathematics and the sciences.

Past Q&A's

Don't Bet on Gambling to Strike it Rich

Gambling is a multi-billion dollar industry in the United States and around the world. Some see it as a dangerous and risky form of recreation; others view it as an excellent and appropriate source of revenue. Pam Pierce, associate professor of mathematical sciences at The College of Wooster, has taught a first-year seminar class on gambling, and she shares her thoughts on some of its more important issues, including whether or not bringing a casino to northeast Ohio is a good idea.

Q. Why do you see gambling as a "widespread national phenomenon"?

A. It is estimated that in 1998, more than 60 percent of the adult U.S. population participated in some form of gambling. By comparison, only 37 percent of registered voters went to the polls in that same year. Over 600 billion dollars changes hands each year as a result of legal gambling transactions. This figure does not include money transferred as a result of wagers made through bookies (illegal bet takers), office pools, and friendly Friday night poker games - all of which are illegal.

Q. Why is the City of Cleveland considering legalizing gambling and bringing a casino to northeast Ohio?

A. Northeast Ohio is looking for ways to generate revenue for funding police, fire, and other valuable services. As long as the state operates the casino, such an establishment could generate millions of dollars, which could be directed toward these and other services.

Q. Is this a common way to generate revenue?

A. In the history of our nation, gambling has often been used to finance projects and services. Lotteries were used to finance the Jamestown Colony in Virginia, as well as many public roads and buildings. Even some colleges and universities, such as Harvard, Williams, Brown, Dartmouth, and Yale, were partially endowed by lotteries. Many states currently use lotteries as a way of funding public education and related programs. So it is not surprising that when a state is looking for new ways to generate revenue, gambling quickly comes to mind.

Q. What would be some of the advantages of legalized gambling in Ohio?

A. In addition to generating funds for important services, a casino in the Cleveland area could generate an estimated 7,000 new jobs. If more people see it as an attraction, a casino would bring in tourists and help to boost the local economy. Ohio residents who wish to gamble in a casino environment would find a local casino more convenient than traveling to Detroit, Atlantic City, Las Vegas, or other places that offer legalized gambling.

Q. Would there be any disadvantages to bringing a casino to northeast Ohio?

A. Certainly. The benefits described above must be weighed carefully against the potential harm they can cause to an area. Studies have shown that with the addition of casinos, many alarming trends become visible over time. We could expect to see higher incidences of bankruptcy and gambling addiction among the local population. Studies have also associated the presence of casinos with an increase in local rates of crime, murder, suicide, and even divorce.

Q. Is it true that legalizing gambling would decrease illegal gambling in the region?

A. This is a common myth, and the opposite is actually true. Evidence from Britain, Australia, and America confirms that the presence of legalized gambling actually increases the incidence of illegal gambling. For example, in Nevada, where sports betting is legal, one can easily find a bookie, who can sometimes offer better odds, accept bets on a credit system, and provide unreported (and, therefore, untaxed) winnings. Because illegal operations can offer this type of service, they often spring up as a form of competition around legal gambling establishments.

Q. If people knew more about the mathematics of gambling, would they stop doing it?

A. I don't think so. State lotteries typically offer very poor odds, and these odds are readily available on the state lottery Web page. Even if the general public were more aware of these odds, my guess is that millions of people would still line up to buy lottery tickets. When there is hope of winning a big prize, people don't always act logically. Casinos will always have customers because they are attractions in and of themselves. Even someone who visits a casino "just to watch" can quickly get drawn in by the excitement and find themselves betting on the various games available. You just have to keep in mind that, over time, the casino always wins.

Block Bottom Bar Block
Last updated: January 10, 2006 · For more information, contact John Finn