The College of Wooster Department of Biology The College of Wooster Department of Biology The College of Wooster Home Page
Contents

Chapter 1 
» Junior Independent Study
» Senior Independent Study

» Off Campus Study

» Criteria for Evaluating Independent Study in Biology

Chapter 2
» Format for Thesis
» Mechanics of Thesis
» Some Rules for Thesis Preparation
» The Biological Literature
» Citations and Bibliographic Format

Chapter 3
» Personnel Responsibilities
» Safety Procedures Sheet
» Emergencies
» Chemical Stockroom
» Special Facilities
» Ordering Chemicals

» Syringe and Needle Policy

» Building Procedures

» Carrel Sign Up and Keys
» Copier Account

 

Criteria Used for the Evaluation of Independent Study in Biology

The following questions provide a basis for faculty evaluation of your independent study work when it is complete.

I. The Proposal

  1. Did the student make original contributions to the development of the project?
  2. Was the project novel? Is the work something that had not been done previously? Did the student modify or extend another, similar project in significant or novel ways?
  3. Did the student actively engage the question, and show creativity and tenacity in fine-tuning the design as the situation required?
II. Literature Survey
  1. Was the literature survey thorough?
  2. Were primary or secondary sources mostly used?
  3. Was the survey done before, during, or after the experimental part of the project?
III. Experimental Design and Experimentation
  1. Did the student follow a clear and consistent experimental design followed closely during their I.S. research?
  2. Did the student set up the experiments in such a way that he/she could statistically evaluate the data?
  3. Were appropriate statistical tests used to evaluate the data?
  4. How well were the experiments performed?
  5. How reliable are the primary data?
  6. Did the student exhibit enthusiasm for the project?
  7. Did the student keep an accurate laboratory or field notebook documenting their work?
  8. Did the student complete the proposed work effectively?
  9. Did the student identify and remedy difficulties encountered in carrying out the work?
  10. If the original proposal was revised during the year, was this due to unavoidable circumstances, or was it the result of lack of timely effort or foresight on the part of the student?

IV. Written Thesis

  1. Is the thesis well written? Is the text clear, concise, and complete? Is it well-organized?
  2. Is the text free of excessive numbers of mechanical errors (typos, grammatical errors)?
  3. Is literature cited appropriately in the text?
  4. Is the bibliographic section done according to the directions given in Pechenik’s "Short Guide to Writing About Biology?"
  5. Does the student indicate a clear understanding of the research question, the data collected and how they relate to the literature on the subject?
  6. Has the student interpreted their data in terms of its biological importance?
  7. Does the student indicate potential and important sources of error in the results?
  8. Does the student suggest further experimentation along the lines of his/her thesis?
  9. Are tables and figures clear, error-free, and with explanatory legends?

V. Oral Defense

  1. Does the student demonstrate a clear understanding of the literature and methods used in his/her area of research?
  2. Does the student know, and can they effectively explain to the examining committee, what was done?
  3. Can the student discuss background information (e.g., coursework) in areas of biology related to his/her project?
  4. Does the student appreciate the broad implications of his/her work?
  5. In the eyes of the examining committee, has the I.S. been a productive experience for the student?
  6. Did the student take ownership of their project, and demonstrate interest and enthusiasm in what was done and learned?
 

 

Last Updated: