LATE HOLOCENE GLACIAL STRATIGRAPHY
OF COLUMBIA BAY ALASKA: EXTENDING THE RECORD

c
Figure
1: Calving
margin of Columbia Glacier during the 2003 field season. (T. Lowell)
Project Overview:
Supported by various sources
The College of Wooster has been able to work with other institutions
such as Columbia University (Lamont-Doherty earth Observatory), The
University of Colorado (Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research), The
University of Cincinnati as well as many other organizations to conduct
field work throughout Alaska since the mid-1990's. The scope of this
research has been to recreate climate histories through the use of
dendrochronology. We have collected hundreds of tree samples that have
provided insight into the periods such as the Medieval warming period,
the Little Ice Age, and other climate changes occuring over the
past 2,000
years. During the 2003 field season under funding provided by NSF grant
9910809*, Greg Wiles,
Jim Figley (Cornerstone
Elementary, Wooster Ohio)
and Matthew Beckwith-Laube of the College of Wooster along with Thomas
Lowell of the University of Cincinnati set out to Columbia Bay to
examine and collect from two sites in the Columbia Fjord. The findings
from this field season will be presented in a senior undergraduate
thesis by Matthew Beckwith-Laube, at the 2003 Geological Society of
America annual meeting in Seattle, Washington, and possible papers to
come. This web site hopes to provied an adequate overivew of the
methodsof dendrochronology as well as the background of study in
Columbia Bay

Figure 2: North facing view of
Columbia
Bay and Columbia Glacier. Distance from the open ice in the lower right
hand corner to the calving margin is roughly 15 kilometers. The glacier
sat here, at its terminal moraine, since its maximum in the 1890's
until it began a drastic retreat to its present position. (T. Lowell)
Project Abstract:
Columbia
Glacier, one of the largest tidewater
glaciers in the northern hemisphere, began a drastic retreat from its
terminus
in 1979 where it had remained for over a century. The glacier has
thinned over
300 hundred meters and retreated 13 kilometers to its present calving
margin.
This drastic retreat has uncovered a previously buried Mountain Hemlock
forest
that was run over by advance of the glacier. Preliminary tree-ring
dating of
the outer ring of tree sections collected in the Summer 2003 from
up-fjord
sites within 1 km of the present calving margin reveal glacial advance
dating
to the early 11th Century A.D. with outer ring dates ranging
from
1020 and 1025 A.D. Seventy subfossil samples from 8 sites in the fjord
are
currently being analyzed and should provide details to this advance
history.
Estimates of advance rates from these up-fjord sites are consistent
with
previously tree-ring estimated rates of about 40 meters per year. In
addition
to logs obtained from these sites, wood samples are being radiocarbon
dated to
understand the complex glacial stratigraphy composed of superimposed
till
layers discovered during the 2003 field season. This stratigraphy could
reflect
earlier advance/retreat cycles and extend the glacial history prior to
the
tree-ring dated advance and observed retreat of the past 1000 years.
Previous Research:
This area represents a
compilation of 5 years of field work and very successful and thorough
data collection. We have aver 300 trees in various chronologies as well
as dozens of samples yet to be processed. Work from our sites has been
published in Quaternary , The Holocene, and various other major
journals. The majority of previous research has focused on the
influence of the North Pacific on climate variations.
Field Location:
With the following pictures,
figures, and text, we aim to provide a solid background about our field
sites. It is only with a sufficent background that we can fully understand what
we are attempting to do at our field sites in question as well as
Columbia Bay as a whole..
Figure 3: Columbia Bay Field
Sites since
1997. Each red dot represents a field site with an outter ring date
from a sub-fossil log. Grey dots represent a living tree that was
sampled. From the 2003 field season we have found outter rings to
average around 1018 A.D. With these dates we can calculate rates of
advance for the advance leading up to the 1808 terminus (Figure from
Megan Kennedy)
Figure 4: Aerial view of
Columbia Bay in
2000. The gold dots represent the two most recent sample sites.
Our site is the northern most site yet sampled in the Columbia
Bay.(B. Molina)
Site Information and
Sample Details:
In order to keep samples
organized and sites seperate, i entered all my data in to this Excel Spreadsheet of Sites
and Locations.
This spreadsheet contains all
available GPS readings, altitude information, inner and outtter ring
dates, as well as any pertenant information reguarding our sites. Also
to maintain seperation between samples and sites i have plotted each
sites information (sample size, elevation, outter ring dates, and site
number) onto a digital picture of sites CG-03-3 and 4.
This will enable us to
run several models looking at the behavior of advancing ice, mainly
thickening rates and modes of advance. We hope to see a succession of
dates ranging from site to site (bottom to top of the valley). If we
see progressively older outter ring dates up valley then we can deduct
that the ice was thickening up valley as it advanced. On the other
hand, if we see progressively younger dates up valley then we can
deduct an advance of ice downvalley coming from above. This model
assumes that logs have been preserved in place and have not been
transported a great distance. Another possibilty arises if we get dates
that do not display any pattern. If this is the case we can assume that
either logs have been transported or the ice did not simply thicken up
or down valley. There could be a variety of movements that occured to
deposit the till and logs in question. Further examination will provide
additional clues as to the depositional history of this valley.
As we continue our examination of these sites we
develop more and more ideas about what has been going on in this
dynamic area. In the coming months i hope to continue with the
construction of a master chronology of the area, determine advance
rates, advance 'style', and possible figure out what these ideas mean
both locally and globally.
h
Figure 5 (right): This image
represents the seperation between sub-sites at site 4. Each site has a
corresponding altitude, sample size, and site number located in the
enclosing box. In coming weeks, it is my aim to also include outter
ring measurements for each site to try and determine the mode of
advance within this valley. (T. Lowell)
Figure 6: Logs located at site
CG-03-3.3.
This is a somewhat typical assemblaged of logs suspended in glacial
till. As you can see, the logs show no solid indicators of glacial
direction or prior growth area. It is encouraging to notice the
abundance of root matter that could suggest minimal transport of the
logs. In several samples pine needles and organic rich soil accompanied
the logs. This also suggests minimal movement. (T. Lowell)
Figure 7 (below): This image from site 4.2 is of organic rich
soil with intermixed hemlock needles. This is encouraging to see
becasue it suggests little transportation of materials after the
glacier uncovered this site. We believe that this norhtern most site
has been uncovered very recently, possible less than 1 year.
(M. Beckwith-Laube)

Figure 8: This image is facing
northeast looking up valley at site 4.3 and 4.4. Notice the two
distinct log assemblages that define this valley. The closer log
assemblage, site 4.3 was situated on a bedrock knob that constricts the
valley greatly. Site 4.4 at the top of the picture is situated just
below a bedrock outcrop. Site 4.4 is drastically different in that it
is constricted by a flat run of the valley. There is more till and
other material clogging this area. (M. Beckwith-Laube)
About Me:
My name is Matthew
Beckwith-Laube and i am a senior at the College of Wooster and i
will graduate (hopefully) this spring. My research interests are global
climate change over the past 20,000 years (give or take a few thousand)
and the role glaciers and other bodies of ice and oceans have in this
global change. It is very important to understand what has been going
on around us since humnan civilization took root. It is interesting to
see what we are doing to our world to change the dynamics of our
climate. Feel free to email me (Mbeckwithla@wooster.edu) with any
corrections, complaints, or suggestions that will assist me in my
thesis or thoughts on this issue.
Figure 9: I am on the left and my
advisor, Dr. Greg Wiles is on the right. In the back ground is the
calving margin of Columbia Glacier. The ice directly behind us is dead
ice that has been left behind as the glacier has retreated. This
picture is just over a small hill from our camp, so the ice margin was
only a few hundered meters from our camp. (M. Beckwith-Laube)
Additional
Resources:
Here is my Power Point Presentation from my
Fall 2003 Geology Club Presentation. It provides an overview as to the
objectives, methods, and prelimenary findings of this project. In the
coming months I will post my chronology of Columbia Bay, some neat
graphs, and additional information as I develop this topic.
Links for additional information on
Dendrochronology, Glacial Geology, and other fun stuff:
The
College of Wooster Geology Links
The
University of Cincinatti
The
Tree-Ring Society
Lamont-Doherty
Climate Links
The
University of Tennesse
The
University of Arizona, Tuscon Arizona
NOAA
PAGES
World
Climate Research Programme:
Climate Variability & Predictability
International
Tree-Ring Data
Bank

Geological
Society of America
Era
Helicopters
*This
material is based upon work supported by the National Science
Foundation under Grant No. 9910805. Any opinions, findings, and
conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are
those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of
the National Science Foundation.