Put Your Money Where Your Patients Are:
A
Study of International Funding for AIDS Treatment
by Margaux J. Day
An Independent Study Thesis
Submitted to the Department of Political
Science
at The College of Wooster
March, 2006
in partial fulfillment of the
requirements of I.S. Thesis
ABSTRACT
Millions of people with HIV/AIDS are in need of anti-retroviral treatment
(ART) in countries whose healthcare systems cannot sufficiently provide the medications.
They rely on funding from foreign countries and international donor agencies to
supply treatment. Despite the millions of dollars donated, there is little research
evaluating if the money actually leads to increases in treatment of people coping
with HIV/AIDS. One possible factor that might affect treatment rates is the source
of funding. Is bilateral aid (aid given by one country), or multilateral aid (aid
given by groups of countries or international organizations) more effective? Another
factor is the recipient of the aid. Are governments or non-governmental organizations
(NGOs) more effective at providing treatment? In my study, I examine these two
factors to determine whether either affects HIV/AIDS treatment in developing countries.
I employ regression analysis to evaluate the types of funding and use case studies
to compare the effectiveness of the different recipients. The study reveals that
bilateral aid is more effective at providing ART than multilateral aid. Evidence
also suggests that countries whose governments receive the majority of funding
provide more treatment than countries whose NGOs receive the majority of funding,
but that NGOs provide most of this treatment within the countries.
Click Here to download the thesis Title Page & Table of Contents
Click Here to download the text of this Independent Study Thesis
Click Here to download the Works Cited for this thesis