![]() |
![]() |
Home | Search | Site Index | Site Map | Directories | |
|
|||
A professor of religious studies and an authority on Eastern religions, Ishwar Harris has been a member of the faculty at The College of Wooster since 1981. In addition to his in-depth knowledge of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam, he is an expert on India's culture and civilization. He is also familiar with Gandhian thought and the Sarvodaya movement. Harris received his bachelor's degree from the Lucknow Christian College in India, his master's of divinity from the Howard Divinity School, his S.T.M. from the Pacific School of Religion, and his Ph.D. from Claremont Graduate School in 1974. Before coming to Wooster, Harris taught religion at Rutgers University from 1974-1981, Prior to that, he was an instructor at San Bernardino State College in 1973-1974. Harris has written two books: Gandhians in Contemporary India: The Vision and the Visionaries in 1998 and Radhakrishna: Profile of a Universalist in 1982. A member of the American Academy of Religion, the Society for Asian Studies, ASIANetwork, and the Ohio Academy of Religion, Harris has taken two trips to a Japanese monastery and one to Sri Lanka to study Buddhism. |
The ongoing tensions between India and Pakistan are a threat to peace, not only in the region but throughout the world as well. Ishwar Harris, professor of religious studies at The College of Wooster, has an insider's perspective on the issues surrounding the political and religious turmoil, and he provides insight as to why both countries find compromise so difficult. What are the major issues in the conflict between India and Pakistan? There are several reasons for the tensions between India and Pakistan. One reason is the partition itself. Before the British left in 1947, the Muslims in India wanted their own nation. Gandhi and some Muslim and Hindu members of the Congress party were opposed to partition because they didn't want to lose the territory or divide the people. One Muslim leader, Mohammad Ali Jinnah, now known as "Father of the Nation" in Pakistan, was very resourceful in rallying his people in a struggle for independence. Thus, Pakistan was created as a separate country.
Another reason for conflict is the Muslim population that
remained behind in India. Some Hindus feel that the loyalties of
these people are not to India, but that they ally themselves
religiously and emotionally to Pakistan. The Kashmir troubles are at
the root of the border wars and recent conflicts. The troubles began
when the Maharaja of Kashmir agreed to sign his territory over to
India when partition occurred. This territory was primarily Muslim.
The flow of Hindus from the newly created Pakistan into India and the
Muslims leaving India for Pakistan resulted in violence and looting.
After partition, in the absence of a quick satisfactory solution to
the Kashmir problem, Pakistan sent an army to capture the territory,
and India's army was invited by the Maharaja to defend the territory.
Then, the United Nations stepped in and declared a cease fire.
Consequently, the area of Kashmir is now divided into three parts
belonging to India, Pakistan, and a small portion to China, and there
have been wars and border skirmishes ever since.
The attack on the Indian parliament building in early December is believed to have targeted the prime minister and the Indian cabinet with the intention of making the Indian government collapse, thereby facilitating an invasion of Kashmir. Bush's anti-terror stance to treat those who harbor
terrorists has put pressure on Pakistani president Parvez Mussharaff
to crack down on terrorists in his country. India has reminded Bush
that Pakistan has allowed terrorism to continue in its borders.
Meanwhile, India is waiting for results before it pulls its
troops back. If the situation does not improve, war may be perceived
as the only alternative to solve the problem once and for all. The
feeling on the street is that India will go to war with Pakistan to
finish the conflict. The intelligentsia realizes that the fact that
both countries have nuclear weapons may be enough to deter them from
fighting. On top of that, it is unlikely that anything will be solved
by war.
If both countries go to war, the U.S. will be greatly
affected, and the entire world will be affected should they use their
nuclear weapons. Right now the feeling is that the U.S. has an
important role to play in uniting the governments to put pressure on
terrorists.
I think that bitterness and anger are greater when conflicts
involve people personally as they do in tensions between families.
Since Indians and Pakistanis come from the same geographic and
political origins their feelings are stronger. Also Islamic
extremists everywhere dislike Hindus, whom they believe are infidels
(Kafirs), and endorse the use of "self-chosen martyrs," also known as
suicide bombers.
Though the U.S. can put pressure on India to surrender Kashmir, the Indian government that allowed this to happen would not be able to stay in power long because of the people's strong feelings. Some have suggested that an independent Kashmir may be the only solution. Although it would hurt India, it may be better than the sacrifices India makes yearly to defend its borders from terrorists. A general feeling in India is that if Kashmir is permitted to be an independent nation, it will be taken over by Pakistan. Furthermore, this will create a serious problem for millions of Muslims who still live in India. |
| Last updated: January 10, 2006 · For more information, contact John Finn | ||