ABSTRACT
This study examines the effectiveness of overt military intervention in slowing
or stopping the killing during ongoing instances of genocide or politicide. Six
alternative hypotheses regarding the potential effects of intervention on genocide/politicide
severity are tested in a cross-national longitudinal analysis of all ongoing genocides
or politicides from 1955 to 1997. The results suggest that interventions that
directly challenge the perpetrator or aid the target of the brutal policy are
the only effective type of military responses, increasing the probability that
the magnitude of the slaughter can be slowed or stopped. Impartial interventions
seem to be ineffective at reducing severity, and interventions to challenge the
perpetrator do not make matters worse for the targets of genocide or politicide.
The findings are consistent with recent arguments that attempts to prevent or
alleviate mass killings should focus on opposing, restraining or disarming perpetrators
and/or removing them from power.
Click Here to download a preprint of this paper in .pdf format
Click Here to download the data used in this paper in .dta (Stata) format
Click Here to download the data used in this paper in .xls (Excel) format